13th October 2008

The Hangover: Wrestling with the 80’s

posted in Word of Reason |

rourke_thewrestler.jpgLast night I had the pleasure of going to the closing night film of the New York Film Festival which was Darren Aronofsky’s The Wrestler.  The movie is about an aging professional wrestler, a guy who was a big star in the 80’s and is now grappling with the realities of what his life has become.  The event itself was also something to behold; I’ve never been that close to paparazzo scumbags who chant “bullshit! bullshit!” at a star who wont pose for more than twenty minutes.  It was a pretty interesting night and a pretty great movie, but don’t worry, since it isn’t being released for several months, I’m not gonna talk about it in any detail.  But, there was one large piece of the overall picture that I found especially interesting and that is that, for people who engaged in it much more than myself, the 80’s are impossible to let go of.

It seems for people who thrived during them, like the main character in this film, that the 80’s were kind of like a war and there are people who are still shell-shocked from having lived through it all.  I don’t know why a particular decade could affect the lives of so many people so substantially, but there is something about the 80’s that really sets it apart.  Or maybe it’s that there’s nothing really there, except for pop culture.  Maybe the country had been through far too much in the 70’s with the gas crisis and the Watergate scandal and consequentially made Debbie Gibson and Axl Rose the most important people in the country.  Even Oliver North had to be seen through the prism of pop culture; for my money, he was the first figure transmuted from the political world to the pop culture one via television, leaving on the specter of import.

The 80’s were able to resist a seriousness that the 90’s never could, Magic Johnson announcing his HIV status and Kurt Cobain’s suicide made sure of that.  Those things as well pointed out how trivial and stupid the 80’s really were; how little substance there was in pop shows at malls and leather pants-wearing, teased-hair metal dudes.  What then becomes the question is: why would some people fight so hard to hang on to that time?  Was there anything there worth maintaining?  For some, I’m sure there was.  But, as someone who was too young and too sheltered from pop culture to know it was happening, the answer is a resounding no.  Like the film, I believe that the 80’s were both the substance-free ‘good ol’ days’ as much as they were a wrecking ball of delusion, though it is very easy for me to feel that way since I didn’t live it.  But, in the end, it’s probably better to have missed the war than suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder.

Share and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • digg
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • LinkaGoGo
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Netvouz
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • scuttle
  • Shadows
  • Simpy
  • Smarking
  • Spurl
  • TailRank
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb

There are currently 4 responses to “The Hangover: Wrestling with the 80’s”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On October 14th, 2008, Tim said:

    Great piece, Matt. Leave it to the Me Generation to never let the fuck up about their “the good ole days.” More importantly, I blame the 80’s for the state we’re in today. There’s no 2008 Economic Crisis without Reaganomics. It was the beginning of the 2nd Gilded Age.

  2. 2 On October 14th, 2008, Avery said:

    Summer 2009, coming to a theatre near you -

    Rock ‘em Sock ‘em Robots: The Movie.

    Directed by Michael Bay
    Starring Denzel Washington as Blue
    and Bruce Willis as Red.
    Featuring the Micro Machine Man as himself.

  3. 3 On October 14th, 2008, Avery said:

    In all seriousness, though, it’s a helluva point you’re making. And I think you’re on to something about how the 80s had an enduring quality to them that preceding decades hadn’t (and maybe the 90s WON’T), and I think you’re right that it has something to do with the permeating pop-culture-ism of the 80s.

    I think part of it must be due to technology, and the fact that no prior decade had been as photographed, documented, or broadcast to the same level as the 80s. Before satellite and cable television gained traction as “must-haves” in every household and allowed the dissemination of information and, more importantly, a sort of absolute American pan-pop-culture (which helps to explain why Debbie Gibson was so disgustingly popular and not only in metropolitan areas) hadn’t existed — so, essentially, your 80s pop culture memories and mine are probably 99% identical. I don’t think kids who grew up in the 60s or 70s really feel that way. So I think the 80s are so enduring because there are benchmarks, fond memoires that we ALL share, so the decade has a sort of rosy glow about it. This is a really bumpkin way of looking at it, since there must be racial/cultural qualifiers to this argument, but whatever.

    Or there’s always the popular International Relations realist way of looking at the 80s — people miss the black ‘n whiteness of the late Cold War, when there were the “good guys” and the “bad guys” and there was a tooth-grinding stability in the world.

  4. 4 On October 14th, 2008, matt said:

    avery, i think you’re right in a large respect - technology does play a large part. the common experience of the beginning of MTV definitely shows that with very few options, the zeitgeist becomes more universal. as well, there’s something about the newness of all the new technology that makes it more “fun” than it was later interpreted as, especially now. it’s interesting that ‘information age’ began with so few choices.

Leave a Reply